Everpix: loved by users, $40K a month, still shut down
Everpix built a well-reviewed photo service with paying subscribers but failed to raise a Series A. Its founders later published their metrics, financials and VC feedback on GitHub.
- Product
- Everpix
- Founder
- Pierre-Olivier Latour, Kevin Quennesson and Wayne Fan
- Launched
- 2012-09
- Model
- Former subscription photo service
Published · 2 min read · 4 sources
Key takeaways
- At its shutdown announcement Everpix had 50,000 sign-ups, 7,000 subscribers and $40,000 a month in subscription sales.
- That covered variable costs but not fixed costs, and the company failed to raise a Series A after $2.3M in funding.
- The founders published the P&L, investor reports and VC rejection notes, a rare public look at a startup's death.
What it is
Everpix was a photo service that aimed to fix "the Photo Mess" of scattered personal photo collections. The founders' repository says it started in 2011 and raised $2.3M from angels and VCs over its lifetime (Everpix Intelligence README). The co-founders were Pierre-Olivier Latour, Kevin Quennesson and Wayne Fan (The Verge).
Timeline
- 2011: Pierre starts prototyping in late spring; Kevin and Wayne join as co-founders that summer; the company incorporates in August (Everpix timeline).
- July 2012: Everpix raises a $1,000,000 Series Seed, after two convertible notes in 2011 (Everpix financials).
- September 2012: Everpix opens for business with a 30-day trial and subscriptions at $40 a year or $4.99 a month (Everpix timeline).
- March 2013: it moves to a freemium model (Everpix timeline).
- April 2013: a $525,000 bridge note arrives as an advance on a Series A (Everpix financials).
- 5 November 2013: after failing to raise a Series A, Everpix announces its shutdown (Everpix Intelligence README). The service closed in December 2013 (Everpix timeline).
Why it worked
Everpix worked as a product. It did not work as a venture-scale business.
- Users came back. The Verge reported a 4.5-star iOS rating, about half of free users returning weekly, and 12.4 percent of free users subscribing, compared with about 6 percent for Evernote (The Verge).
- Customers paid. The founders report 50,000 sign-ups, including 7,000 subscribers, and $40,000 a month in subscription sales over the last three months (Everpix Intelligence README).
- A habit feature helped. The Verge says the daily Flashback email led to a big spike in daily returning users (The Verge).
What to learn
- Price against your fixed costs, not only your servers. Everpix's revenue covered variable costs but not the fixed costs of the business (Everpix Intelligence README).
- Start distribution early. The Verge's verdict was that the team "began marketing too late" (The Verge).
- If you compete with free tools from platforms, explain why someone should trust you with their data. Compare Pocket and Omnivore.
Risks and what didn't work
- The Series A never came. The founders say they had enthusiastic early adopters and strong press but could not raise in a competitive VC market (Everpix Intelligence README).
- Costs outran revenue. The published P&L shows $269,974.47 in subscription income against $394,588.35 spent on Amazon Web Services alone (Everpix financials).
- Free giants. The Verge says Everpix failed to position itself against Apple and Google, which offered mostly free alternatives (The Verge).
- Numbers differ slightly by source. The Verge reported 55,000 users while the founders' README says 50,000 sign-ups. We use the founders' figure in the summary (The Verge, Everpix Intelligence README).
FAQ
Short answers drawn from the sections above.
What is Everpix?
Everpix was a photo service that aimed to fix "the Photo Mess" of scattered personal photo collections. The founders' repository says it started in 2011 and raised $2.3M from angels and VCs over its lifetime (Everpix Intelligence README). The co-founders were Pierre-Olivier Latour, Kevin Quennesson and Wayne Fan (The Verge).
Why did Everpix work?
- Users came back. The Verge reported a 4.5-star iOS rating, about half of free users returning weekly, and 12.4 percent of free users subscribing, compared with about 6 percent for Evernote (The Verge).
- Customers paid. The founders report 50,000 sign-ups, including 7,000 subscribers, and $40,000 a month in subscription sales over the last three months (Everpix Intelligence README).
- A habit feature helped. The Verge says the daily Flashback email led to a big spike in daily returning users (The Verge).
What can indie builders learn from Everpix?
- Price against your fixed costs, not only your servers. Everpix's revenue covered variable costs but not the fixed costs of the business (Everpix Intelligence README).
- Start distribution early. The Verge's verdict was that the team "began marketing too late" (The Verge).
- If you compete with free tools from platforms, explain why someone should trust you with their data. Compare Pocket and Omnivore.
What didn't work for Everpix, and what are the risks?
- The Series A never came. The founders say they had enthusiastic early adopters and strong press but could not raise in a competitive VC market (Everpix Intelligence README).
- Costs outran revenue. The published P&L shows $269,974.47 in subscription income against $394,588.35 spent on Amazon Web Services alone (Everpix financials).
- Free giants. The Verge says Everpix failed to position itself against Apple and Google, which offered mostly free alternatives (The Verge).
- Numbers differ slightly by source. The Verge reported 55,000 users while the founders' README says 50,000 sign-ups. We use the founders' figure in the summary (The Verge, Everpix Intelligence README).
Sources
Every link cited above, in order of first use.
- 1.Everpix Intelligence README (github.com)
- 2.The Verge (theverge.com)
- 3.Everpix timeline (github.com)
- 4.Everpix financials (github.com)
Related case studies
More in Consumer apps →Raycast: a Mac habit funded a cross-platform expansion
Raycast announced $30M to bring its productivity workflow beyond the Mac. Its paid AI and sync features show a monetization layer, not disclosed unit economics.
Arc: beloved browser, novelty tax, then a hard pivot to Dia and a sunset
The Browser Company's Arc won superfans but not mass retention. CEO Josh Miller froze feature work in 2025 for AI browser Dia; Arc is set to stop working on 22 Dec 2026.
Moxie: an $800 kids' robot that died with its startup's cloud
Embodied's Moxie robot needed the company's cloud to work. When a funding round collapsed, the company shut down and most owners got no refunds; an open-source server saved some robots.